Savagery… 25 Years Later.

by Juan Arango on September 24, 2008 · 6 comments

To many Barcelona fans, all 120,000 of them that came to the Nou Camp that fate­ful Sep­tem­ber 24th saw that this was going to be their year.  If hav­ing won the Copa del Rey the year before was any indi­ca­tion, the match against defend­ing champ Ath­letic Bil­bao would be their defin­ing state­ment.  Lit­tle would they know that it would be the begin­ning of the end of an era.  It was a day when they game on the field was vio­lated by the men that had per­sonal vendet­tas of their own.  The most intense rivalry of the moment in Spain was between the Basques and the Cata­lans.  To many peo­ple, Barcelona´s rivalry with Bil­bao reached a boil­ing point and was much more intense than the one they had against Real Madrid dur­ing that three-year period.  The matches between these two were more steel cage fights than skill­ful chess matches.  They were all-out bat­tles on the pitch and the rea­son would be due to the sto­ry­lines and sub­plots that developed

Barcelona mid­fielder Bernd Schus­ter knew that he was going to be fac­ing Andoni Goikotxea.  This man tore his ACL just two sea­son before, caus­ing him to miss nine months of the 1981–82 sea­son.  So there would be that sense of revenge on behalf of the Ger­man mid­fielder.  If there was one man that Schus­ter would have liked to seen hurt it was ¨The Bil­bao Butcher¨.  He got his rep­u­ta­tion not because of the skill he had with the ball or his finesse while run­ning around the pitch.   His tough guy image was as vis­i­ble as Rus­sia from Sarah Palin´s backyard.

Another sub­plot that got fans´ blood boil­ing  was also the exchange of words between coaches Javier Clemente and César Luis Menotti that made the inten­sity of the game esca­late even more.

Vendet­tas and side­plots were the  soup du jour in Span­ish soci­ety back in 1983.  It was a time in which Span­ish soci­ety began to see their lives affected on an every­day basis by three let­ter– ETA.  The Basque sep­a­ratist move­ment killed 43 peo­ple in var­i­ous ran­dom attacks and bomb­ings through­out the coun­try.  For many peo­ple and in the media, they looked at this instant in Span­ish foot­ball as a micro­cosm of what was going on in the coun­try.  They were able to make a fig­u­ra­tive con­nec­tion between It was a time where sev­eral things would get con­fused with  play­mak­ers were being attacked in almost ¨ter­ror­ist¨ fash­ion.  The con­text was a bit dis­torted to a point where the game and national pol­i­tics of the time were con­fused.   Basque sep­a­rtist move­ment ETA claimed the lives of 43 peo­ple that year and the attack on Maradona was being looked at in the same light. As crazy as it seems now, it was very log­i­cal at the moment.  It was easy to make sense of all of this espe­cially when it was a Basque that caused this injury.  It fur­ther rein­forced the idea that the anti-football that the Basques played was ¨sep­a­rate¨ to what teams like Real Madrids and Barcelonas played.

Barcelona romped over Ath­letic Blibao by two goals and Andoni Goikoetxea looked for revenge against the blau­grana after Bernd Schus­ter came after the Basque hard­man.  Barça went up 3–0 and things looked secure for the culés.  So when things  Unfor­tu­nately, the young Argen­tine star would be caught in the cross­fire.  Maradona would tell the Bil­bao hard­man to calm down, and the lat­ter would take offense to El Pibe´s com­ment.   Goiko knew that some­thing had to be done in order to get back at Schus­ter for a pre­vi­ous chal­lenge that the Ger­man inter­na­tional gave him.  Maradona´s com­ment changed the tar­get.  He saw the Argen­tine star run­ning towards a ball and Goikoetxea sim­ply went after Maradona´s ankle.  He would end up with vir­tu­ally a state of shock after all three main ankle lig­a­ments were torn medial malle­o­lus was fractured.

The Argen­tine inter­na­tional would be out for four months.   Bil­bao would even­tu­ally win their sec­ond con­sec­u­tive league title and would face off against Maradona´s side at the San­ti­ago Bern­abéu for the final of the Copa del Rey and the Basque´s would come out on top to earn their domes­tic dou­ble.   Despite the result the game was marred by one of the most vio­lent post-game brawls in his­tory. That would be the last time El Diego would ever wear the blau­grana jer­sey.  He would later make a move to lit­tle known Ital­ian side Napoli and help them become one of the biggest sides in Europe dur­ing the late 80´s and early 90´s.

In an arti­cle writ­ten this past Mon­day by Span­ish daily El País, the inci­dent was  revis­ited.    In the arti­cle, they talk to  Goikoetxea about the entire inci­dent now.  Many play­ers through­out the years called it ¨hard but uncal­cu­lated¨.  Goikoetxea said in the inter­view that he never meant to hurt the Argen­tine star and asked for apolo­gies.  To this date, his apol­ogy was not accept, but it was answered– unfor­tu­nately not the way the Bil­bao cen­ter back wanted it to be.   Goikoetxea´s cause was not helped very much when then club pres­i­dent Pedro Aurtenetxe came out and said, ¨I can´t be held respon­si­ble for what hap­pens if Maradona keeps talk­ing.¨  Then after the brawl Maradona men­tioned that Bil­bao were after him and that Goikoetxea want to ¨fin­ish what he started.¨

Goikoetxea´s legacy will for­ever be etched in foot­ball for the wrong rea­sons.  In 2007, he was given the dubi­ous by Eng­lish news­pa­per The Times dis­tinc­tion of being ¨awarded¨ the most vio­lent foot­ball in his­tory and thus became the poster­child for Basque ter­ror­ism in football.

Whether you come from the camp that believe that is the case or not is irrel­e­vant.  You can see that the sport has evolved in some aspects and regressed in oth­ers.  Goikoetxea´s foul would have been (nine times out of 10) a direct red card and a sus­pen­sion.   He only received a yel­low, although the dis­ci­pli­nary board gave him an 18-match suspension.

The dis­plea­sure was obvi­ous when peo­ple saw Goikoetxea was cheered by the Bil­bao faith­ful in their next home match as the Baque faith­ful thought that the sus­pen­sion given to the Span­ish inter­na­tional was exces­sive. Goiko would score a goal and would help Bil­bao win a cru­cial Euro­pean Cup match against Lech Poz­nan. He would then be taken off the field on the shoul­ders of his team­mates and to the crown chant­ing his name. This is why he did some­thing that seems con­tro­ver­sial to many. A man  seems more like a hunter when he places the  boots that he only wore twice in a glass case. Those boots were the same ones that he was just break­ing in when he broke Diego Maradona´s ankle.  To many it´s a encas­ing a weapon.  To Goikoetxea it´s a reminder.

¨I hope I am not mis­in­ter­preted.  I don´t want peo­ple to think that I did this I did this is in order to sym­bol­ize the two sides of the game. The time after I was being harassed after injur­ing (Maradona) and then the sup­port I got from the Bil­bao fans afterwards.¨

Wow, the more things change.  The more things stay the same.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

6 comments… read them below or add one

1 carl September 24, 2008 at 1:47 pm

Really interesting reading about a famous (or should I write in-famous) tackle! Really horrible.. This tackle sends a shiver down my spine every time I see it.
But why no comments about Maradona kicking a lying man in the head to unconsciousness in the video from the brawl after the Copa del Rey-final? That kick is extremly nasty..

Reply

2 elisaFF September 25, 2008 at 6:22 pm

Bilbao has always played a very physical style of football. I do not condone the horrific tackle, but per norm the media sensationalizes the tackle and the entire situation. Trying to make a story out of anything. Andoni apologized, let's move on.

Reply

3 Gringo September 25, 2008 at 7:56 pm

I don't know where you got that bit about Maradona trying to calm things (just reading it doesn't make sense… Maradona never tried to calm anything in his LIFE) It is well known that Maradona spent the entir match trash talking to Andoni (and Andoni's mother…) Let's not make sinners out of saints nor saints out of sinners… We all know Maradona was NEVER about fairplay.

Reply

4 Juan September 26, 2008 at 11:54 am

Eilsa, the boots in the case. Come on. Maradona is no saint, but to consider it a ¨symbol of both sides of football¨. Also it was the 25th anniversary of the tackle. But based on everything you read, it seems like world football has changed a whole deal.

Reply

5 elisaFF September 26, 2008 at 10:30 pm

Yes the boots in the case is disgusting. But Maradona's retaliation is brutal as well. The dark side of the game I am afraid. Let us try not to glorify the whole hideous memory.

Reply

6 mattio23 January 9, 2009 at 1:30 am

phil shoen is illiterate when it comes to the basics of the game, garbage

Reply

Leave a Comment